Prior evidence that downloads predict citations

Harnad, S. and Brody, T. (2004) Prior evidence that downloads predict citations.

There is a more recent version of this item available.

Download

HTML 4Kb

Abstract

Pernbeger's (2004) finding that download counts (what we call "usage impact") of British Medical Journal articles predict citation counts ("citation impact") for those articles in subsequent years confirm what Tim Brody's online usage/citation correlator http://citebase.eprints.org/analysis/correlation.php has been demonstrating for several years now across a number of areas in physics and mathematics ( Brody & Harnad 2004, in prep.): There is a significant correlation between downloads today and citations two years later.

Available versions of this item

• Measuring and Maximising UK Research Impact. (deposited 19 Jun 2003)
  • Let All Knowledge Be Free That Wants to be Free. (deposited 15 Sep 2004)
    • Enrich Impact Measures Through Open Access Analysis. (deposited 02 Jan 2005)
      • Prior evidence that downloads predict citations. (deposited 02 Jan 2005) [Currently Displayed]
        • Comparing the Impact of Open Access (OA) vs. Non-OA Articles in the Same Journals. (deposited 02 Jan 2005)

Tools

Metadata

Download Statistics

Members of ECS may view the download statistics dashboard for this record.

References in Article

Select the SEEK icon to attempt to find the referenced article. If it does not appear to be in this archive you will be forwarded to the paracite service. Poorly formated references will probably not work.

Corrections

Repository Staff Only: item control page