Gargouri, Y., Hajjem, C., Lariviere, V., Gingras, Y., Brody, T., Carr, L. and Harnad, S. (2010) Self-Selected or Mandated, Open Access Increases Citation Impact for Higher Quality Research. PLOS ONE . (Submitted)
![]() | There is a more recent version of this eprint available. Click here to view it. |
Download
|
Submitted Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. 409Kb | |
|
Supplemental Material Rich Text (RTF) (Response to Comments) Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. 19Kb | ||
|
Supplemental Material PDF (SUPPLEMENT-1: Analysis minus CERN and minus CERN&Southampton) Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. 82Kb | |
|
Supplemental Material PDF (SUPPLEMENT-2: Analysis with 1 added to citation counts to eliminate null log-ratios) Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. 54Kb | |
|
Supplemental Material PDF (SUPPLEMENT-3: Analysis separately for citation ranges 0-4 and 5+) Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. 55Kb | |
|
Supplemental Material PDF (SUPPLEMENT-4: Analysis of OA proportions at each citation count) Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. 75Kb |
Abstract
Articles whose authors make them Open Access (OA) by self-archiving them online are cited significantly more than articles accessible only to subscribers. Some have suggested that this "OA Advantage" may not be causal but just a self-selection bias, because authors preferentially make higher-quality articles OA. To test this we compared self-selective self-archiving with mandatory self-archiving for a sample of 27,197 articles published 2002-2006 in 1,984 journals. The OA Advantage proved just as high for both. Logistic regression showed that the advantage is independent of other correlates of citations (article age; journal impact factor; number of co-authors, references or pages; field; article type; country or institution) and greatest for the most highly cited articles. The OA Advantage is real, independent and causal, but skewed. Its size is indeed correlated with quality, just as citations themselves are (the top 20% of articles receive about 80% of all citations). The advantage is greater for the more citeable articles, not because of a quality bias from authors self-selecting what to make OA, but because of a quality advantage, from users self-selecting what to use and cite, freed by OA from the constraints of selective accessibility to subscribers only.
| Item Type: | Article | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Creator/Authors: |
| ||||||||||||||
| Keywords: | open access, research impact, citation impact, logistic regression, self-archiving, open access mandates | ||||||||||||||
| Research Group: | Current ECS Groups > Web and Internet Science Old ECS Groups > Intelligence, Agents, Multimedia | ||||||||||||||
| Date: | 3 January 2010 | ||||||||||||||
| Information about this record: | |||||||||||||||
| Performance Indicator: | EZ~07~03~11 | ||||||||||||||
| Citations: | ISI: 4, Google Scholar: 16 | ||||||||||||||
| Downloads (2010): | 346 | ||||||||||||||
| ID Code: | 18346 | ||||||||||||||
| Last Modified: | 23 Sep 2011 10:38 | ||||||||||||||
| Deposited On: | 03 Jan 2010 17:26 by Harnad, Stevan | ||||||||||||||
Available versions of this item
- Self-Selected or Mandated, Open Access Increases Citation Impact for Higher Quality Research. (deposited 03 Jan 2010 17:26) [Currently Displayed]
Tools & Metadata
Download Statistics
Members of ECS may view the download statistics dashboard for this record.
References in Article
Select the SEEK icon to attempt to find the referenced article. If it does not appear to be in this archive you will be forwarded to the paracite service. Poorly formated references will probably not work.
Corrections
ECS staff and postgraduates may modify this record
Available Versions of this Item
- Self-Selected or Mandated, Open Access Increases Citation Impact for Higher Quality Research. (deposited 03 Jan 2010 17:26) [Currently Displayed]










