Harnad, S. (2011) What Is To Be Done About Public Access to Peer-Reviewed Scholarly Publications Resulting From Federally Funded Research? (Response to US OSTP RFI). Technical Report , Electronics and Computer Science, University of Southampton. (Submitted)
Download
|
Updated Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. 671Kb | |
![[img]](http://eprints.ecs.soton.ac.uk/style/images/fileicons/application_msword.png) |
Updated Version Microsoft Word Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. 633Kb |
Abstract
The minimum should be to mandate that:
(i) the fundee’s revised, accepted refereed final draft
(ii) of all refereed journal articles (including refereed conference articles) resulting from the funded research must be
(iii) deposited immediately upon acceptance for publication
(iv) in the fundee’s institutional repository.
(v) Access to the deposit must be made gratis OA (online access free for all) immediately (no OA embargo) wherever possible (over 60 % of journals already endorse immediate gratis OA self-archiving).
| Item Type: | Technical Report | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Creator/Authors: |
| ||
| Keywords: | open access, mandates, USA, institutional repositories, Green OA | ||
| Research Group: | Current ECS Groups > Web and Internet Science | ||
| Date: | 31 December 2011 | ||
| Information about this record: | |||
| Performance Indicator: | EZ~01~01~14 | ||
| ID Code: | 23080 | ||
| Last Modified: | 03 Jan 2012 10:52 | ||
| Deposited On: | 01 Jan 2012 01:23 by Harnad, Stevan | ||
Tools & Metadata
Download Statistics
Members of ECS may view the download statistics dashboard for this record.
Corrections
ECS staff and postgraduates may modify this record
